It's not Going to Go as We think

The number of places to monitor the "chatter" of Q followers is diminishing. Social media sites are starting to lock them down or shut them off entirely. I lost a site in the great Facebook purge two weeks ago. Two months ago, my account was locked out on Twitter for not following "community standards." Of course we know that reason is laughable. Twitter and Facebook's "community standards" includes allowing perverts to swap child porn and they actively promote "alternative" lifestyles. Mentioning Qanon on those platforms is simply more than they can tolerate.

As the election approaches, I am less convinced that ever that this is going to turn out the way any of us hoped. I am not doubtful of Qanon's veracity or intentions. I just am all the more skeptical that any man-made movement is going to supplant the Cabal. I am hopeful that it will and I am ready to lend my support to that end; however, it is of its efficacy that I am doubtful.

If Q is successful, the operation will topple a deeply-entrenched power structure that has been in place for hundreds of years and which controls trillions of dollars in wealth. What happen if the Cabal is destroyed? Who decides what is to be done with its agents and its assets? Will there be an international tribunal to make those determinations? If America tries to decide the disposition of those assets, then the world will turn on America. If the world meets in concert to discuss the disposition of that wealth, there will be contention. Some nation will declare that it's not getting a fair share. Disputes will arise between nationalities and ethnicities.

For example, black Americans may insist that they deserve a large share for the crime of slavery, from which the Cabal profited. That's certainly justifiable, but what would be a just share of the spoils? If African Americans get a chunk of money as recompense for their ancestors' suffering, then there are claims to be made across the board. How much should Jews get for the Holocaust? Or the Armenians? Or Native Americans? Every single person has suffered in some degree because of the Cabal. Everyone has some reason to make a claim for damages and suffering.

The disagreements over these issues could result in nations going to war with each other or nations devolving into bickering tribalism along ethnic lines. Unless Q has a plan to stand up a global government that is as powerful as the Cabal, how is it going to work? Who decides the form of that governance? We just might be trading one group of despots for another.

Charles W. Penrose, wrote for the Millennial Star in September 1859, discussing the tribulations of floods, fires, plagues, and wars of the last days, that "in the midst of all these calamities, the master-minds among the nations will be taken away, and fear will take hold of the hearts of all men." Who are the "master-minds" of whom he speaks? Are they not the Cabal, who currently dominate the current world order?" When they are gone, what will replace them?

I am not arguing that the Cabal should not be eliminated. Indeed, the gross wickedness it represents needs to go. However, what if the vacuum of power left in its absence causes irreparable damage to the social order? We might cause a collapse that brings about a resurgence or rebirth of the Cabal, this time even more vindictive and ruthless. What if we inflict the deadly wound to the first beast, only to have it miraculously reconstitute itself as the second beast of Revelation?

For this reason, I believe we have grave cause for concern. Victory by the patriots and Q might cause something far worse to emerge. It might be that second beast that is given power to make war upon the saints of God and overcome them for a time. This could get rough. Pray. Be ready.

Notes:

Penrose, Charles W. Millennial Star, 21:582, September 19, 1859.